🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there was some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.