🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – seems like it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.